Political and Economic Discourses of Centralization and Decentralization: Education and Science in Russia

Incidents  are  increasingly  occurring  in  schools,  for  which  municipalities  are  being  held responsible in Russia. Business makes complaints about the level of training of university graduates, which is a problem of coordinating the activities of the leadership of the constituent entities of the Federation with classical and technical universities. According to the authors, this is a consequence of the functioning of informal institutions that have developed in post-Soviet Russia in the field of education and science. Differences are determined by the different informal institutions that develop in these organizations. Such institutions are identified by insiders – employees and consumers of services (parents of pupils and students, students themselves), distinguishing between types of schools and universities. But their knowledge remains tacit and is not included in public discussion. From the point of view of officials responsible for the functioning of secondary and higher schools, some types of organizations highlighted in the work do not exist. Scientific activity began to be assessed on the basis of bibliometric indicators. But there is an international legal cartel operating in this area, which allows large publishing houses to maximize their income. Russian scientists spent about $ 10 million in 2020 to pay for the services of the publishing houses. The current system meets the needs of representatives of elite universities and schools, which is common for peripheral capitalism. At the same time, municipalities and Subjects of the Federation are very interested in changing the situation – minimizing the scope of “negative” informal institutions in schools, developing advanced scientific and educational centers in the regions.

1. Fridman M., Fr idman R . Svoboda v ybi rat’. Nasha pozitsi ia [Freedom to Choose. Our Position]. Moscow, Novoe izdatel’stvo, 2007, 356 p. (In Russ.).

2. Bouz D. Libertarianstvo: istoriia, printsipy, politika [Libertarianism: History, Principles, Politics]. Moscow, Cheliabinsk, Sotsium, 2022, 408 p. (In Russ.).

3. Bekker G. Chelovecheskoe poveden ie: ekonom ichesk i i podk hod. Izbrannye trudy po ekonomicheskoi teorii [Human Behavior: an Economic Approach. Selected Works on Economic Theory]. Moscow, GU VShE, 2003, 672 p. (In Russ.).

4. Burd’e P. Ekonomicheskaia antropologiia. Kurs lektsii v kollezh de Frans (1922–1993) [Economic Anthropology. Course of Lectures at the College de France (1922–1993)]. Moscow, ID Delo, 2019, 416 p. (In Russ.).

5. Veber M. “Ob”ektivnost’” sotsial’no-nauchnogo i sotsial’no-politicheskogo poznaniia [“Objectivity” of Socio-Scientific and Socio-Political Knowledge], Veber M. Izbrannye proizvedeniia [Weber M. Selected Works]. Moscow, Progress, 1990, pp. 345–415. (In Russ.).

6. Andreev A.L. O modernizatsii obrazovaniia v Rossii. Istoriko-sotsiologicheskii analiz [On the modernization of education in Russia. Historical and sociological analysis], Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniia [Sociological Studies], 2011, No. 9 (329), pp. 111–120. (In Russ.).

7. Makarenko A .S. Pedagogicheskaia poema [Pedagogical Poem]. Moscow, Ek smo, 2015, 640 p. (In Russ.).

8. Ivanov A.E. Studenchestvo Rossii kontsa XIX – nachala XX veka: sotsial’no-istoricheskaia sud’ba [Students in Russia at the End of the 19th – Beginning of the 20th Century: the Socio-Historical Fate]. Moscow, ROSSPEN, 1999, 414 p. (In Russ.).

9. Goland Iu.M. Diskussii ob ekonomicheskoi politike v gody denezhnoi reformy 1921–1924 [Discussions about Economic Policy During the Years of Monetary Reform 1921–1924]. Moscow, Ekonomika, 2006, 631 p. (In Russ.).

10. Kuz’minov Ia.I., Iudkevich M.M. Universitety v Rossii: kak eto rabotaet [Universities in Russia: How It Works]. Moscow, Izd. dom Vysshei shkoly ekonomiki, 2022, 616 p. (In Russ.).

11. Vysshaia shkola segodnia: tsifry i fakty [Higher School Today: Numbers and Facts]. Moscow, NIIVO, 1990. (In Russ.).

12. Kochetov A.N. Professional’noe obrazovanie v 60–80-kh: godakh put’ k infliatsii [Vocational Education in the 60–80s: the Path to Inflation], Otechestvennaia istoriia [Domestic History], 1994, No. 4-5, pp. 143–158. (In Russ.).

13. Merton P. Iavnye i latentnye funktsii [Explicit and Latent Functions], Amerikanskaia sotsiologicheskaia mysl’ [A mer ican Sociological T hought]. Moscow, 1994, pp. 379-447. (In Russ.).

14. Russeau D. Psychological and Implied Contracts in Organisations, Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 1989, Vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 121–139.

15. Orek hovsk i i P.A . In novatsion naia ekonom i ka v svete teor i i neiavnogo kontrak ta [Innovative Economics in the Light of the Theory of Implicit Contract], Obshchestvo i ekonomika [Society and Economics], 2011, No. 3, pp. 5–35. (In Russ.).

16. Olson M. Logika kollektivnykh deistvii. Obshchestvennye blaga i teoriia grupp [Logic of Collective Actions. Public Goods and Group Theory]. Moscow, Fond ekonomicheskoi initsiativy, 1995, 165 p. (In Russ.).

17. Kurbatova M.V., Donova I.V. Provaly gosudarstva v realizatsii proekta effektivnogo kontrakta [State Failures in Implementing an Effective Contract Project], Zhurnal institutsional’nykh issledovanii [Jour nal of Institutional Research], 2022, Vol. 14, No. 4, pp. 56–69. (In Russ.).

18. Veblen T. Teoriia prazdnogo klassa [Theory of the Leisure Class]. Moscow, Progress, 1984, 368 p. (In Russ.).

19. Stigler G.J. The Theory of Economic Regulation, Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science, 1971, Vol. 2, Iss. 1, pp. 3–21.

20. Polterovich V.M. Reforma RAN: ekspertnyi analiz. Novaia ekonomicheskaia assotsiatsiia [Reform of the Russian Academy of Sciences: Expert Analysis. New Economic Association]. (In Russ.). Available at: http://www.econorus.org/pdf/Polterovich_Reform_RAS.pdf (accessed 15 January 2023).

21. Varshavskii A.E. Problemy nauki: RAN i vuzy [Problems of Science: RAS and Universities], Zhurnal Novoi ekonomicheskoi assotsiatsii [Journal of the New Economic Association], 2010, No. 8, pp. 158–161. (In Russ.).

22. Varshavskii A.E., Markusova V. Potracheno s umom. Rezul’tativnost’ nauchnogo truda v Rossii vyshe, chem v Amerike [Spent Wisely. The Productivity of Scientific Work in Russia is Higher Than in America], Gazeta “Poisk” [Poisk Newspaper], No. 21, 2009, 27 May, p. 14. (In Russ.).

23. Orlova G.A. Forum: Prikladnaia naukometriia [Forum: Applied Scientometrics], Antropologicheskii forum [A nthropological Forum], 2019, No. 40, pp. 36– 40. (In Russ.).

24. Stigler Dzh. Grazhdanin i gosudarstvo. Esse o regulirovanii [Citizen and State. Essay on Regulation]. Moscow, Izdatel’stvo Instituta Gaidara, 2017, 336 p. (In Russ.).

25. Nikols T. Smert’ ekspertizy: kak internet ubivaet nauchnye znaniia [The Death of Expertise: How the Internet is Killing Scientific Knowledge]. Moscow, Eksmo, 2019, 368 p. (In Russ.).

26. Prebish R. Periferiinyi kapitalizm: est’ li emu al’ternativa? [Peripheral Capitalism: is There an Alternative to It?]. Moscow, ILA, 1992, 337 p. (In Russ.).

27. Sokolov M., Titaev K. Provintsial’naia i tuzemnaia nauka [Provincial and Native Science], Antropologicheskii forum [Anthropological Forum], 2013, No. 19, pp. 239–275. (In Russ.).

28. Polterovich V.M. Elementy teorii reform [Elements of the Theory of Reforms]. Moscow, Ekonomika, 2007, 447 p. (In Russ.).

29. Zombart V. Burzhua. Etiudy po istorii dukhovnogo razvitiia sovremennogo ekonomicheskogo cheloveka [Bourgeois. Sketches on the History of the Spiritual Development of Modern Economic Man]. Moscow, TERRA – Knizhnyi klub, 2009, 576 p. (In Russ.).