Legal Inequality of the Subjects of the Russian Federation and the Problems of Ensuring the Unity of the Legal Space

Simultaneously with  the evolution  of the modern  Russian  state, federal  relations are also developing.  Since  2000, one of the priorities of state development  has been to ensure the unity  of the Russian  state. This  task was realized  through the formation  of a unified  legal system, ensuring the unity  of the system of public authority, the unity  of the status of the individual  throughout the state, the sovereignty and state integrity of the Russian Federation, the supremacy  of the Constitution  of Russia  and  federal  laws  throughout  its territory, the unity  of the  economic  space.  The  concept  of «unity  of legal space» has  steadily  entered the constitutional  and legal matter, the study of which  is devoted to quite a few theoretical studies.  No  less than  practical studies reflecting the results of the ongoing work  to ensure the unity  of the legal space in Russia.  It is impossible to carry out such a policy without ensuring genuine  legal equality  of the regions that  make  up the Russian  Federation.  The diverse and  numerous  composition of the subjects of the Russian  Federation, the diversity of their interests, factors of law-making and law enforcement  practice have given rise to a multidimensional phenomenon  consisting in the presence of different  rights (opportunities) of the subjects of the Russian  Federation  implemented  in the field of law-making (in  the presence of uniformly  established  their subjects of competence  and  powers), to which  the federal center reacts differently.  The existence of such a practice indicates a violation of the principle of equality of the subjects of the Russian  Federation among themselves  (Part 1 of art. 5 of the Constitution  of Russia)  and in relations with  federal state authorities  (Part 5 of Article 5 of the Constitution  of Russia).  Such  a view (approach)  in research on the legal equality of the subjects of the Russian  Federation and ensuring the unity of the legal space is innovative.  The  article reveals the depth of differences, the reasons and  motives for the occurrence  of such  examples, and  also suggests a  mechanism  for their  settlement, using numerous  practical examples, including based on the author’s experience.

1. Kirienko G.S. Nekotorye problemy realizatsii printsipov rossiiskogo federalizma: teoriia i praktika [Certain Problems of Realization of Principles of Russian Federalism: Theory and Practice], Konstitutsionnoe i munitsipal’noe pravo [Constitutional and Municipal Law], 2012, No. 8, pp. 45–47. (In Russ.).

2. Bratko T.D. Osnovnye problemy obespecheniia samostoiatel’nosti sub”ektov federatsii v sfere formirovaniia biudzhetnykh dokhodov [Key Issues of Ensuring Regional Revenue Autonomy in Federal Countries], Sravnitel’noe konstitutsionnoe obozrenie [Comparative Constitutional Review], 2016, No. 3, pp. 40–51. (In Russ.).

3. Narutto S.V. Edinstvo i mnogoobrazie rossiiskogo federalizma [The Unity and Diversity of Russian Federalism], Aktual’nye problemy rossiiskogo prava [Actual Problems of Russian Law], 2017, No. 9, pp. 56–67. (In Russ.).

4. Politova I.P., Gorodilov A.A. K voprosu razvitiia dogovornoi osnovy federalizma v Rossii [On Development of Contractual Basis of Federalism in Russia], Gosudarstvennaia vlast’ i mestnoe samoupravlenie [State Power and Local Self-Government], 2017, No. 6, pp. 20–24. (In Russ.).

5. Channov S.E. Ekonomicheskoe neravenstvo sub”ektov Rossiiskoi Federatsii i munitsipal’nykh obrazovanii v kontekste obespecheniia konstitutsionnykh prav i svobod grazhdan [Economic Inequality of Constituent Entities in the Russian Federation in the Context of Providing Constitutional Rights and Freedoms of Citizens], Zhurnal rossiiskogo prava [Journal of Russian Law], 2019, No. 10, pp. 30–41. (In Russ.).

6. Kruss V.I. Institut subfederal’nogo zakonotvorchestva v Rossiiskoi Federatsii: sostoiatel’nost’ i perspektivy konstitutsionnoi modernizatsii [The Institution of Subfederal Law Making in the Russian Federation: Consistency and Prospects of Constitutional Modernization], Konstitutsionnoe i munitsipal’noe pravo [Constitutional and Municipal Law], 2020, No. 1, pp. 45–54. (In Russ.).

7. Mikhaleva N.A. Konstitutsii i ustavy sub”ektov Rossiiskoi Federatsii (sravnitel’no-pravovoe issledovanie) [Constitutions and Charters of the Subjects of the Russian Federation (Comparative Legal Research)]. Moscow, Iurkompani, 2010. (In Russ.).

8. Khlopushin S.N. K voprosu o konstitutsionno-pravovom statuse sub”ektov Rossiiskoi Federatsii [On the Constitutional and Legal Status of the Subjects of the Russian Federation], Konstitutsionnoe i munitsipal’noe pravo [Constitutional and Municipal Law], 2012, No. 9, pp. 42–47. (In Russ.).

9. Malyi A.F. O ravnopravii sub”ektov Rossiiskoi Federatsii i kriteriiakh ego proiavleniia [On the Equality of Rights of Constituent Entities of the Russian Federation and Criteria for its Manifestation], Konstitutsionnoe i munitsipal’noe pravo [Constitutional and Municipal Law], 2019, No. 7, pp. 51–54. (In Russ.).

10. Leksin I.V. Pravovaia asimmetriia v territorial’nom ustroistve gosudarstva: teoriia i praktika [Legal Asymmetry in the Territorial Structure of the State: Theory And Practice], Gosudarstvennoe upravlenie. Elektronnyi vestnik [Public administration. Electronic bulletin], Iss. 35. Dekabr’ 2012 g. (In Russ.). Available at: http://e-journal.spa.msu.ru/vestnik/item/35_2012leksin.htm

11. Gritsenko E.V. Federalizm i mestnoe samoupravlenie v svete rossiiskoi konstitutsionnoi reformy 2020 goda [Federalism and Local Self-Government in the Light of Russian Constitutional Reform 2020], Sravnitel’noe konstitutsionnoe obozrenie [Comparative Constitutional Review], 2020, No. 4. pp. 80–97. (In Russ.).

12. Bartsits I.N. Pravovoe prostranstvo Rossii: voprosy konstitutsionnoi teorii i praktiki [The Legal Space of Russia: Issues of Constitutional Theory and Practice]. Moscow, 2000, 496 p. (In Russ.).

13. Bykov S.N. Obespechenie sootvetstviia zakonodatel’stva Respubliki Buriatiia Konstitutsii Rossiiskoi Federatsii i federal’nomu zakonodatel’stvu: opyt i perspektivy, Avtoref. diss. kand. iurid. nauk [Ensuring Compliance of the Legislation of the Republic of Buryatia with the Constitution of the Russian Federation and Federal Legislation: Experience and Prospects. PhD law sci. abstract diss.], Moscow, 2003, 28 p. (In Russ.).

14. Guliagin A.Iu. Administrativnyi mandat organov iustitsii v sfere obespecheniia edinstva pravovogo prostranstva [Administrative Mandate of the Judicial Authorities in the Field of Ensuring the Unity of the Legal Space], Zhurnal rossiiskogo prava [Journal of Russian Law], 2009, No. 2, pp. 27–33. (In Russ.).

15. Annenkova V.G. Pravovoe prostranstvo sovremennoi Rossii: poniatie, struktura i mekhanizm obespecheniia edinstva [Legal Space of Modern Russia: the Concept, Structure and Mechanism of Ensuring Unity], Konstitutsionnoe i munitsipal’noe pravo [Constitutional and Municipal Law], 2005, No. 4, pp. 22–23. (In Russ.).

16. Artamonov A.N. Monitoring zakonodatel’stva kak sposob obespecheniia edinstva pravovogo prostranstva [Monitoring of Legislation as a Measure of Procurement of Unity of Legal Space], Zhurnal rossiiskogo prava [Journal of Russian Law], 2011, No. 9, pp. 80–86. (In Russ.).