Preview

Federalism

Advanced search

Problems of Legal Regulation of Master Plans

https://doi.org/10.21686/2073-1051-2025-1-71-93

Abstract

The new urban development tool, master plans, began to be used in 2021. Initially, they were planned to be used for 25 cities in the Far East, but it became not only a building plans, but a vector for the long-term development of territories. While master plans are characterized by a lack of flexibility and turn into formal documents, it is assumed that the development of master plans will resolve these problems by ensuring a balance between the interests of residents, businesses, authorities and investors. At the same time, uncertainty about the status and content of the master plans provokes various conflicts, in particular, with urban planning regulations and plans for land use and development, since the master plan is currently not integrated into the hierarchy of urban planning documentation. Its advantage, on the one hand, is that the procedure for adopting this development tool is poorly regulated by regulations, so it remains flexible and comprehensive. But on the other hand, the lack of regulation of the master plan by the norms of legislation can lead to increased corruption in its implementation. Today there are many gaps in the regulatory support of master plans that affect the effectiveness of their practical implementation. The article concludes that it is necessary to carefully study the regulatory framework in order to avoid collisions of master plans with other urban planning documents and documents of territorial and strategic planning, as well as to avoid overregulation of this new tool for the development of territories.

About the Authors

M. V. Gligich-Zolotareva
The Federal Council of the Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation

GLIGICH-ZOLOTAREVA Milena V., Cand. Sc. (Law), Staff Member of the Information and Analytical Department

26, Bolshaya Dmitrovka Str., Moscow, 103426



N. U. Naumenko
The Federation Council of the Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation

NAUMENKO Nikita U., Staff Member of The Information and Analytical Department

26, Bolshaya Dmitrovka Str., Moscow, 103426



References

1. Bell D. The Emergence of Contemporary Masterplans: Property Markets and the Value of Urban Design, Journal of Urban Design, 2005, No. 10 (1), pp. 81–110.

2. Revzin G. Plan bez plana. Genplan Moskvy kak dokument rannego feodalizma. [A Plan Without a Plan. The General Plan of Moscow as a Document of Early Feudalism]. (In Russ.). Available at: http://projectclassica.ru/newsmake/29_2009/29_2009_04.htm

3. Malinova O.V. O reformirovanii territorial’nogo planirovaniia v Rossiiskoi Federatsii v tseliakh kompleksnogo i ustoichivogo razvitiia territorii. Master-plan [On the Reform of Territorial Planning in the Russian Federation for the Purposes of Integrated and Sustainable Development of the Territory. Master Plan], Academia. Arkhitektura i stroitel’stvo [Academia. Architecture and Construction], 2020, No. 1, pp. 5–12. (In Russ.).

4. Il’ina I.N. Izmenenie podkhodov k protsessu general’nogo planirovaniia gorodov: transformatsiia ili smena nazvaniia [Changing Approaches to the Process of General Urban Planning: Transformation or Change of Name], Voprosy gosudarstvennogo i munitsipal’nogo upravleniia [Issues of Public and Municipal Administration], 2024, No. 1, pp. 84–109. (In Russ.).


Review

For citations:


Gligich-Zolotareva M.V., Naumenko N.U. Problems of Legal Regulation of Master Plans. Federalism. 2025;30(1):71-93. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21686/2073-1051-2025-1-71-93

Views: 133


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2073-1051 (Print)