RELATIONS BETWEEN STATE BODIES AND TRADE UNIONS OF SIBERIA (1918—1929)

The problems of the trade union movement are multidimensional and each state has its own characteristics related to the cultural and historical past of nations, traditions, ethnic composition of the population, level of economic development of the state, its territorial communities, etc. Along with the specific features of trade union organizations, theory and practice defined relatively well-established principles of forming trade unions and their tasks, which can be used in the further development of the state, including in today’s Russia. In this regard, the development of relations between trade unions and state structures of Siberia in the 1920s is of great importance. Twentieth century. It was at this time that new areas of work of trade union bodies associated with the development of the Soviet state system are growing and gaining strength. This includes the nomination by the trade unions of candidates for leadership, above all economic, positions and uncritical support by the trade unions of any proposals from managers of enterprises and the abandonment of the struggle for workers’ rights in state enterprises, etc. Thus, Russia began the process of merging trade union organizations with the Soviet state. The reluctance of the trade unions to draw a clear distinction between their duties and the role of the appendages of economic bodies in production had a painful effect on relations with the workers. Such a position of the trade unions separated them from the real needs and demands of the workers, caused frustration and apathy of the population towards the trade union movement.

1. ГАРФ. Ф. 5451. Оп. 5. Д. 127. С. 12.

2. Бакшеев А.И. Причины, последствия и борьба с голодом 1921—1924 гг. в Сибири // Федерализм. № 2(70), 2013. С. 183—190.

3. ГАРФ. Ф. 5451. Оп. 7. Д. 214. С. 16—18.

4. ГААК. Ф.Р. 77. Оп. 2. Д. 222. С. 49—51.

5. ГАРФ. 5451. Оп. 9. Д. 329. С. 3—7.

6. В Сибирском бюро ЦК Вс. союза горнорабочих // Профессиональное движение Новониколаевск. 1922. № 12. С. 62—69.

7. ГАРФ. Ф. 5451. Оп. 9. Д. 220. С. 36—37.

8. Бакшеев А.И. Проблемы функционирования советского государственного аппарата Сибири в первой половине 1920-х гг. // Вестник Сибирского юридического института МВД России. 2011. № 1(9). С. 123—131.

9. Борьба со взяточничеством // Правда. 14 нояб. 1922 г. № 257. С. 5.

10. Кроник Я. Некоторые итоги Сибконференции // Профессиональное движение. Новониколаевск. 1924. № 1. С. 1—22.

11. ГАКК. Ф. 731. Оп. 5. Д. 76. С. 6—7.

12. Материалы ко Второй Всесибирской конференции профсоюзов 4 декабря 1923. Новониколаевск, 1923. С. 1—38.

13. Гинзбург Л. Недочеты профработы в Сибири // Профессиональное движение. 1925. № 46. С. 1—10.