Bioeconomy as One of the Ways To Sustainable Development of Russian Regions
https://doi.org/10.21686/2073-1051-2023-1-56-79
Abstract
Bioeconomy is considered as a special type of activity and economic system, which is based on the science achievements, primarily related to biology, as well as chemistry, bioengineering, computer science, ecology, and even sociology. This activity is actively carried out in dozens of countries where national bioeconomy development programs have been formed. The existing programs provide, first of all, for the set of works implementation performed with the help of biotechnologies for the goods (bioproducts) based on natural bioresources production, including industrial, agricultural and household waste processing. As a result, global and regional bioproducts markets are being formed, providing consumers with new materials, as well as intangible benefits and services. The bioeconomy state analysis in several leading countries, as well as in the Russian Federation, indicates the expediency of using a regional approach to bioeconomy development, as well as advance training of relevant personnel. To achieve these goals, it is proposed to use several principles arising from the essence of the bioeconomy activity organization.
About the Authors
E. S. Titova
Federal State Budgetary Institute of Higher Education “Plekhanov Russian University of Economics”
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Titova Ekaterina S. – PhD. (Econ.), Leading Researcher of the Education Development Research Institute
36, Stremyanny Lane, Moscow, 117997
S. S. Shishkin
Federal Research Centre “Fundamentals of Biotechnology” of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Shishkin Sergey S. – Dr. Sc. (Biol.), Senior Researcher of the Analytical Group
33, Building 2, Leninsky Av., Moscow, 119071
D. A. Shtykhno
Federal State Budgetary Institute of Higher Education “Plekhanov Russian University of Economics”
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Shtykhno Dmitry А. – PhD. (Econ.), Vice-Rector
36, Stremyanny Lane, Moscow, 117997
References
1. Iakovets Iu.V., Rastvortsev E.E. O sisteme tselei i strategii ustoichivogo razvitiia Evraziiskogo ekonomicheskogo soiuza [On the System of Goals and Strategy for Sustainable Development of the Eurasian Economic Union], Ekonomicheskie strategii [Economic Strategies], 2016, Vol. 18, No. 7 (141), pp. 6–21. (In Russ.).
2. Schanz H., Federer J., Wilczynski M. Markets as Leverage Points for Transformations of Economic Systems: The Example of the German Bioeconomy, Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 2019, Vol. 33, pp. 140–161. DOI:10.1016/j.eist.2019.04.003
3. Singh R., Paritosh K., Pareek N., Vivekanand V. Integrated System of Anaerobic Digestion and Pyrolysis for Valorization of Agricultural and Food Waste Towards Circular Bioeconomy: Revie, Bioresource Technology, 2022, Vol. 360, pp. 127596. DOI:10.1016/j. biortech.2022.127596
4. Paes L.A.B., Stolte Bezerra B., Jugend D., Liar Agudo F. Prospects for a Circular Bioeconomy in Urban Ecosystems: Proposal for a Theoretical Framework, Journal of Cleaner Production, 2022, Vol. 380, pp. 134939. DOI:10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134939
5. Takala T., Tikkanen J., Haapala A., Pitkanen S., Poykko T. Shaping the Concept of Bioeconomy in Participatory Projects – an Example from the Post-Graduate Education in Finland // Journal of Cleaner Production. 2019, Vol. 221, pp. 176–188. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.02.007
6. Alcalay M., Jereczek-Fossa B.A., Pepa M., Volpe S., Zaffaroni M., Fiore F., Marvaso G., Pravettoni G., Curigliano G., Santaguida S., Pelicci P.G. Biomedical Omics: First Insights of a New MSc Degree of the University of Milan, Tumori, 2021, Vol. 108, Iss. 1, pp. 6–11. DOI:10.1177/03008916211047268
7. Swetha T.A., Mohanrasu K., Sudhakar M., Raja R., Ponnuchamy K., Muthusamy G., Arun A. A Comprehensive Review on Techniques Used in Conversion of Biomass into Bioeconomy, Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, 2022, Vol. 53, pp. 102682. DOI: 10.1016/j.seta.2022.102682
8. Kircher M., Maurer, K.-M. Herzberg D. KBBE: The Knowledge-Based Bioeconomy: Concept, Status and Future Prospects, EFB Bioeconomy Journal, 2022, Vol. 2, pp. 100034. DOI: 10.1016/j.bioeco.2022.100034
9. Wohlgemuth R., Twardowski T., Aguilar A. Bioeconomy Moving Forward Step by Step – a Global Journey, New Biotechnology, 2021, Vol. 61, pp. 22–28. DOI:10.1016/j. nbt.2020.11.006
10. Khan A.H., López-Maldonado E.A., Khan N.A., Villarreal-Gómez L.J., Munshi F.M., Alsabhan A.H., Perveen K. Current Solid Waste Management Strategies and Energy Recovery in Developing Countries – State Of Art Review, Chemosphere, 2022, Vol. 291 (Part 3), pp. 133088. DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.133088
11. Aguilar A, Bochereau L, Matthiessen L. Biotechnology as the Engine for the Knowledge-Based Bio-Economy, Biotechnology and Genetic Engineering Reviews, 2010, Vol. 26, pp. 371–388. DOI: 10.5661/bger-26-371
12. Deshar P. A Global Look into the Prospects of Bioeconomy, Yrkeshögskolan Novia, 2016, 76 p. Available at: http://www.theseus.fi/handle/10024/115759
13. Patermann C., Aguilar A. A Bioeconomy for the Next Decade, EFB Bioeconomy Journa, 2021, Vol. 1, pp. 100005. DOI: 10.1016/j.bioeco.2021.100005
14. Lang C. Bioeconomy – from the Cologne Paper to Concepts for a Global Strategy, EFB Bioeconomy Journal, 2022, Vol. 2, pp. 100038. DOI: 10.1016/j.bioeco.2022.100038
15. Hasgall A., Saenen B., Borrell-Damian L., Van Deynze F., Seeber M., Huisman J. Doctoral Education in Europe Today: Approaches and Institutional Structures, EUA CDE, 2019. Available at: https://www.eua-cde.org/downloads/publications/ online%20eua%20cde%20survey%2016.01.2019.pdf
16. Bednyi B.I., Bekova S.K., Rybakov N.V., Terent’ev E.A., Khodeeva N.A. Professional’naia aspirantura: mirovoi opyt i rossiiskii kontekst [Professional Postgraduate Studies: World Experience and Russian Context],Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii [Higher Education in Russia], 2021, Vol. 30, No. 10, pp. 9–21. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.31992/0869- 3617-2021-30-10-9-21
17. Titova E.S., Shishkin S.S., Kritskii M.S., Kamionskaia A.M. Tsifrofizatsiia i «-omiki» – novye podkhody k podgotovke nauchnykh kadrov [Digitization and «-Omics» – New Approaches to the Scientific Personnel Training], Vysshee obrazovanie segodnia [Higher Education in Russia], 2020, No. 10, pp. 28–33. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.25586/RNU.HET.20.10.P.28.
18. Shtykhno D.A., Konstantinova L.V., Gagiev N.N. Smirnova E.A., Nikonova O.D. Transformatsiia modelei universitetov: analiz strategii razvitiia vuzov mira [Transformation of University Models: Analysis of Development Strategies for World Universities], Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii [Higher Education in Russia], 2022, Vol. 31, No. 6, pp. 27–47. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.31992/0869-3617-2022-31-6-27-47
19. Fava F., Gardossi L., Brigidi P., Morone P., Carosi D.A.R., Lenzi A. The Bioeconomy in Italy and the New National Strategy for a More Competitive and Sustainable Country, New Biotechnology, 2021, Vol. 61, pp. 124–136. DOI: 10.1016/j. nbt.2020.11.009
20. Vinober A.V. «Predely rosta»: mify i real’nost’ [«Limits to Growth»: Myths and Reality], Biosfernoe khoziaistvo: teoriia i praktika [Biosphere Economy: Theory and Practice], 2022, No. 2 (43), pp. 90–105. (In Russ.).
21. Dixon T.A., Williams T.C., Pretorius I.S. Bioinformational Trends in Grape and Wine Biotechnology, Trends in Biotechnology, 2022, Vol. 40, Iss. 1, pp. 124–135. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2021.05.001
22. De Carvalho Freitas E.S., Xavier L.H., Oliveira L.B., Nani Guarieiro L.L. System Dynamics Applied to Second Generation Biofuel in Brazil: A Circular Economy Approach, Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, 2022, Vol. 52, Part D, pp. 102288. DOI: 10.1016/j.seta.2022.102288
23. Ramos M.D.N., Milessi T.M., Candido R.C., Mendes A.A., Aguiar A. Enzymatic Catalysis as a Tool in Biofuels Production in Brazil: Current Status and Perspectives, Energy for Sustainable Development, 2022, Vol. 68, pp. 103–119. DOI: 10.1016/j.esd.2022.03.007
24. Watanabe M.D.B., Morais E.R., Cardoso T.F., Chagas M.F., Junqueira T.L., Carvalho D.J., Bonomi A. Process Simulation of Renewable Electricity from Sugarcane Straw: Techno-Economic Assessment of Retrofit Scenarios in Brazil, Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020, Vol. 254, pp. 120081. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120081
25. Aba M.M., Galo A.C. Le Roux G.A.C., Menezes B.C. Integrated Ethanol and Gasoline Supply Chain Planning under Environmental Constraints: A Case Study of Brazil, Computers and Chemical Engineering, 2022, Vol. 164, pp. 107875. DOI: 10.1016/j. compchemeng.2022.107875
26. Bastos Lima M.G. Just Transition Towards a Bioeconomy: Four Dimensions in Brazil, India and Indonesia, Forest Policy and Economics, 2022, Vol. 136, pp. 102684. DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2021.102684
27. Devaney L., Iles A. Scales of progress, power and potential in the US bioeconom, Journal of Cleaner Production, 2019, Vol. 233, pp. 379–389. DOI: 10.1016/j. jclepro.2019.05.393
28. Avelino A.F.T., Lamers P., Zhang Y., Chum H. Creating a Harmonized Time Series of Environmentally-Extended Input-Output Tables to Assess the Evolution of the US Bioeconomy – A Retrospective Analysis of corn Ethanol and Soybean Biodiesel, Journal of Cleaner Production, 2021, Vol. 321, pp. 128890. DOI: 10.1016/j. jclepro.2021.128890
29. Bogner K., Dahlke J. Born to Transform? German Bioeconomy Policy and Research Projects for Transformations Towards Sustainability, Ecological Economics, 2022, Vol. 195, pp. 107366. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2022.107366
30. Le Pera A., Sellaro M., Bencivenni E., D’Amico F. Environmental Sustainability of an Integrate Anaerobic Digestion-Composting Treatment of food Waste: Analysis of an Italian Plant in the Circular Bioeconomy Strategy, Waste Management, 2022, Vol. 139, pp. 341–351. DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2021.12.042
31. Wei X., Liu Q., Pu A., Wang S., Chen F., Zhang L., Zhang Y., Dong Z., Wan X. Knowledge Mapping of Bioeconomy: A Bibliometric Analysis, Journal of Cleaner Production, 2022, Vol. 373, pp. 133824. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133824
32. Ustinova K.A. Teoreticheskie osnovy issledovaniia institutsional’nykh faktorov ekonomicheskogo razvitiia [Theoretical Foundations of the Economic Development Institutional Factors Study], Zhurnal ekonomicheskoi teorii [Journal of Economic Theory], 2020, Vol. 17, No. 1, pp. 187–197. (In Russ.).
33. Mandják T., Lavissière A., Hofmann J., Bouchery Y., Lavissière M.C., Faury O., Sohier R. Port Marketing from a Multidisciplinary Perspective: a Systematic Literature Review and Lexicometric Analysis, Transport Policy, 2019, Vol. 84, pp. 50–72. DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2018.11.011
34. Bondarchuk N.V., Titova E.S. Perspektivy vozobnovliaemoi energetiki kak odnogo iz napravlenii ustoichivogo razvitiia nekotorykh regionov Iuga Rossii [Renewable Energy Prospects as One of Sustainable Development Direction in Some South Russian Regions], Iug Rossii: ekologiia, razvitie [South of Russia: Ecology, Development], 2017, No. 4, pp. 12–31. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.18470/1992-1098-2017-4-12-31
35. Titova E.S. Biofuel Application as a Factor of Sustainable Development Ensuring: The Case of Russia, Energies, 2019, No. 12, pp. 39–48. DOI: 10.3390/ en12203948
36. Boyarov A., Osmakova A., Popov V. Bioeconomy in Russia: Today and Tomorrow, New Biotechnology, 2021, Vol. 60, pp. 36–43. DOI: 10.1016/j.nbt.2020.08.003
Review
For citations:
Titova E.S., Shishkin S.S., Shtykhno D.A. Bioeconomy as One of the Ways To Sustainable Development of Russian Regions. Federalism. 2023;28(1):56-79. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21686/2073-1051-2023-1-56-79
Views:
2424
Email this article 