Evaluation Criteria and Algorithm for Calculating the Environmental Quality Index of Rural Areas
https://doi.org/10.21686/2073-1051-2022-2-62-81
Abstract
In the context of the implementation of the state program for the integrated development of rural areas, the issue of assessing the quality of the environment of rural areas remains particularly relevant in order to determine priority areas of development and allocation of budget funds. Until now, there was no such methodology, at the same time there was a methodology for assessing the quality of the urban environment, which is not applicable in rural territories, since it does not take into account the specifics of their development. The article presents a methodology for calculating the quality of rural areas. The authors emphasize in their research the relevance of the development of this methodology, as it will allow to assess the quality of rural areas and on its basis to propose directions for improving the policy of state regulation within the framework of existing regulatory legal acts. The authors identified the key areas of rural environment development, 11 assessment groups and the assessment is carried out by 30 indicators for each object of assessment. A point system has been developed for the transition from absolute values of indicators by indicators to a single calculation system. As part of the assessment, integral indices are also formed that allow assessing the quality of the environment at the level of the whole country, individual regions, municipalities and settlements. At each level of assessment, it is possible to identify key areas of improvement, work in which will ensure maximum effect for the growth of the quality of the rural environment at various levels of management.
About the Authors
I. V. LavrentievaRussian Federation
Irina V. Lavrentieva - Director of the Scientific Center for the Study of Rural Problems, Russian State Agrarian Correspondence University.
50, Highway Enthusiasts Str., Balashikha, 143907.
V. V. Javakhia
Russian Federation
Vahtang V. Javakhia - Leading Researcher of the Scientific Center for the Study of Problems of Rural Territories, Russian State Agrarian Correspondence University.
50, Highway Enthusiasts Str., Balashikha, 143907.
N. V. Sedova
Russian Federation
Nadezhda V. Sedova - Dr. Sc. (Econ.), Associate Professor, Professor of the Department of National and Regional Economics, Plekhanov Russian University of Economics.
36, Stremyanny Lane, Moscow, 117997.
References
1. Kovalev S.A. Kompleksnoe regional’noe izuchenie sel’skoi mestnosti sredi drugikh napravlenii sotsial’no-ekonomicheskoi geografii [Integrated Regional Study of Rural Areas Among Other Areas of Socio-Economic Geography], Sel’skaia mestnost’: territorial’nye aspekty sotsial’no-ekonomicheskogo razvitiia: mezhvuzovskij nauchnyj sbornik [Rural Area: Territorial Aspects of Socio-Economic Development: Interuniversity Scientific Collection]. Ufa, 1986, pp. 59–64. (In Russ.).
2. Uzun V.Ia. Glavnye faktory ustoichivogo sel’skogo razvitiia: biudzhetnye subsidii ili sel’skaia ekonomika? [The Main Factors of Sustainable Rural Development: Budget Subsidies or the Rural Economy?], Sel’skie territorii v prostranstvennom razvitii strany: potentsial, problemy, perspektivy [Rural Territories in the Spatial Development of the Country: Potential, Problems, Prospects]. Moscow, VIAPI imeni A.A. Nikonova, 2019, pp. 15–20. (In Russ.).
3. Savchenko V.I., Khirevich S.A. Determinatsiia ekonomicheskoi sushchnosti formirovaniia kachestvennoi gorodskoi sredy [Determination of the Economic Essence of the Formation of a Qualitative Urban Environment], Problemy sovremennoi ekonomiki [Problems of Modern Economics], 2016, No. 2 (58), pp. 182–186. (In Russ.).
4. Podol’skii A.I. Promezhutochnyi otchet o nauchno-issledovatel’skoi rabote po proektu “Provedenie issledovaniia povedencheskikh modelei sel’skikh zhitelei i razrabotka plana meropriiatii po formirovaniiu pozitivnogo obraza sel’skikh territorii” [Interim Report on the Research Work on the Project “Conducting a Study of the Behavioral Patterns of Rural Residents and Developing an Action Plan to Form a Positive Image of Rural Areas”]. Moscow, 2021. (In Russ.).
5. O sostoianii sel’skikh territorii v Rossiiskoi Federatsii v 2018 godu [On the State of Rural Areas in the Russian Federation in 2018], Ezhegodnyi doklad po rezul’tatam monitoring [Annual Report on the Results of Monitoring], Iss. 6. Moscow, FGBNU “Rosinformagrotekh”, 2020, 224 p. (In Russ.).
6. Fadeeva O.P. Neformal’noe gosudarstvenno-chastnoe partnerstvo kak initsiativa snizu: sel’skie keisy [Informal Public-Private Partnership as an Initiative From Below: Rural Cases], Krest’ianovedenie [Peasant Studies], 2020, Vol. 5, No. 3, pp. 131–134. (In Russ.).
7. Fadeeva O.P., Nefedkin V.I. “Regional’nyi dirizhizm” i sel’skaia samoorganizatsii v Tatarstane [“Regional Dirigisme” and Rural Self-Organization in Tatarstan], Krest’ianovedenie [Peasant Studies], 2018, Vol. 3, No. 3, pp. 95–114. (In Russ.).
8. Alston J., Chan-Kang C., Marra M., Pardey P. & Wyatt T. A Meta-Analysis of Rates of Return to Agricultural R&D. Research Report 133. Washington, International Food Policy Research Institute, 2000.
9. Anriquez G., Foster W., Ortega J., Falconi C. & de Salvo C. Public Expenditures and the Performance of Latin American and Caribbean, IDB Working Paper. No. IDB-WP-722, Washington, Inter-American Development Bank, 2016.
10. Gardner B.L. Causes of rural economic development, Agricultural Economics, 2005, No. 32 (SUPPL. 1), pp. 21–41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0169-5150.2004.00012.x
11. Christaller W. Central Places in Southern Germany. Prentice Hall, 1966.
Review
For citations:
Lavrentieva I.V., Javakhia V.V., Sedova N.V. Evaluation Criteria and Algorithm for Calculating the Environmental Quality Index of Rural Areas. Federalism. 2022;27(2):62-81. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21686/2073-1051-2022-2-62-81