Regionalization of Human Capital Development and US Regional Innovation Policy

Over the past 70 years, human capital, which is the most important factor in the innovation process and innovation activity in the United States, has acquired spatial forms corresponding to territorial innovation systems. Under the influence of the instruments of the state regional innovation policy, the regionalization of the development of human capital in the United States has gone through its own evolutionary path, dialectically coupled with the cyclical processes of socio-economic and technological development of society. The tendencies of human capital regionalization revealed on the basis of the systemic and evolutionary approaches reveal the subject-object essence of the research. The phenomenon of regionalization of human capital development investigated in the work is reflected in the dynamics of average annual growth rates, under the influence of the unambiguous in its direction, but having subregional differences in the instruments of selective equalization and proactive regional innovation policy, as well as differences at the level of the leading states of the United States.

1. Novosel’tseva A.S. Kliuchevye funktsii megapolisov v global’noi ekonomike: sistemnost’ issledovaniia [Key Functions of Megacities in the Global Economy: Systematic Research], Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriia 9. Ekonomicheskie nauki [Bulletin of the Volgograd State University. Series 9. Economic Sciences], 2011, Iss. 9, pp. 71–77. (In Russ.).

2. Baburin V.L., Zemtsov S.P. Innovatsionnyi potentsial regionov Rossii: monografiia [Innovative Potential of the Regions of Russia]. Moscow, Universitetskaia kniga, 2017, 358 p. (In Russ.).

3. Valentei S.D. Ekonomika innovatsii i natsional’naia innovatsionnaia sistema [Economics of Innovation and the National Innovation System], Innovatsionnyi chelovek i innovatsionnoe obshchestvo [Innovative Person and Innovative Society], edited by V.I. Supruna. Novosibirsk, FSPI “Trendy”, 2012, pp. 121–133. (In Russ.).

4. Valentei S.D. Interv’iu ob ekonomicheskoi nauke, marksizme i obrazovanii [Interview on Economics, Marxism and Education], Idei i idealy [Ideas and Ideals], 2016, No. 4 (30), Vol. 2, pp. 161–173. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17212/2075-0862-20164.2-161-173.

5. Abazieva G.K. Chelovecheskii kapital kak faktor modernizatsii rossiiskoi ekonomiki [Human Capital as a Factor in the Modernization of the Russian Economy], Vestnik Rostovskogo gosudarstvennogo ekonomicheskogo universiteta [Bulletin of the Rostov State University of Economics], 2009, No. 3, pp. 15–26. (In Russ.).

6. Minat V.N. Migratsii nauchnykh rabotnikov vysshei kvalifikatsii v SShA [Migration of Highly Qualified Scientists in the United States], Nauka o cheloveke: gumanitarnye issledovaniia [Science of Man: Humanitarian Research], 2020, Vol. 14, No. 3, pp. 182–188. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17238/issn1998-5320.2020.14.3.22

7. Minat V.N., Chepik A.G. Immigratsiia uchenykh i inzhenerov v SSh A za poslednie 20 let: osnovnye tendentsii poliarizatsii migratsionnogo potoka [Immigration of Scientists and Engineers to the United States over the Past 20 Years: The Main Trends in the Polarization of the Migration Flow], Vestnik Cheliabinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, Ekonomicheskie nauki [Bulletin of the Chelyabinsk State University, Economic Sciences], 2020, No. 2 (436), Iss. 68, pp. 162–173. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.24411/1994-2796-2020-10216

8. Minat V.N., Chepik A.G. Sovremennye osobennosti raspredeleniia, ispol’zovaniia i razmeshcheniia nauchnogo personala v SShA [Modern Features of the Distribution, Use and Placement of Scientific Personnel in the United States], Vestnik NGUEU [Bulletin of NSUEU], 2020, No. 2, pp. 198–212. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.34020/20736495-2020-2-198-212

9. Kuznetsova I.G. Sushchnost’, formy, evoliutsiia, sostavliaiushchie “chelovecheskii capital” kak ekonomicheskuiu kategoriiu [Essence, Forms, Evolution That Make Up “Human Capital” as an Economic Category], ETAP: ekonomicheskaia teoriia, analiz, praktika [ETAP: Economic Theory, Analysis, Practice], 2021, No. 2, pp. 97–106. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.24412/2071-6435-2021-2-97-96-106

10. Gorbanev V. Chelovecheskii kapital i postindustrializatsiia [Human Capital and Post-Industrialization], Mirovoe i natsional’noe khoziaistvo [World and national Economy], 2016, No. 3 (38), pp. 4–15. (In Russ.).

11. Salakhova Iu.Sh. Teoretiko-metodologicheskie osnovy issledovaniia soderzhaniia chelovecheskogo potentsiala i ego roli v formirovanii chelovecheskogo kapitala [Theoretical and Methodological Foundations for Studying the Content of Human Potential and Its Role in the Formation of Human Capital], Pravo. Ekonomika. Psikhologiia [Law. Economy. Psychology], 2020, No. 3 (19), pp. 55–60. (In Russ.).

12. Kazanokov R.K. Osobennosti sovremennoi innovatsionnoi politiki v SShA [Features of Modern Innovation Policy in the United States], Ekonomicheskaia bezopasnost’ [Economic Security], 2021, Vol. 4, No. 2, pp. 273–290. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.18334/ecsec.4.2.111931

13. Bitkina I.V. Regional’naia innovatsionnaia politika: mezhdunarodnyi opyt [Regional Innovation Policy: International Experience], Upravlenie naukoi i naukometriia [Science Management and Scientometrics], 2014, Iss. 15, pp. 174–182. (In Russ.).

14. Arnaut M.N. Definitsiia poniatii “chelovecheskii capital”, “chelovecheskii potentsial” i “chelovecheskii resurs” [Definition of the Concepts of “Human Capital”, “Human Potential” and “Human Resource”], ETAP: ekonomicheskaia teoriia, analiz, praktika [ETAP: Economic Theory, Analysis, Practice], 2021, No. 2, pp. 79–85. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.24412/2071-6435-2021-2-79-85

15. Savel’eva I.P., Kilina I.P. Prostranstvennye aspekty funktsionirovaniia regional’nykh innovatsionnykh sistem [Spatial Aspects of the Functioning of Regional Innovation Systems], Innovatsii i investitsii [Innovations and Investments], 2019, No. 7, pp. 11–17. (In Russ.).

16. Kharchenko E.V., Geiderikh P.V. Tsikly i etapy sotsial’no-ekonomicheskogo razvitiia obshchestva v kontekste protsessov sozidatel’nogo razrusheniia [Cycles and Stages of Socio-Economic Development of Society in the Context of the Processes of Creative Destruction], Izvestiia Iugo-Zapadnogo gos. universiteta. Seriia: Ekonomika. Sotsiologiia. Menedzhment [News of the South-West State University. Series: Economics. Sociology. Management], 2018, Vol. 8, No. 2 (27), pp. 17–30. (In Russ.).

17. Arrigi Dzh. Dolgii dvadtsatyi vek. Den’gi, vlast’ i istoki nashego vremeni [The Long Twentieth Century. Money, Power and The Origins of Our Time], translated from English. Moscow, Territoriia budushchego, 2006, 470 p. (In Russ.).

18. Drucker P. The discipline of innovation, Harvard business review, 2008, No. 76 (6), pp. 149–157.

19. Brenner R. Ekonomika global’noi turbulentnosti. Razvitye kapitalisticheskie ekonomiki v period ot dolgogo buma do dolgogo spada, 1945 – 2005 [Economics of Global Turbulence. Developed Capitalist Economies in the Period from Long Boom to Long Recession, 1945–2005], translated from English. Moscow, ID VShE, 2014, 552 p. (In Russ.).

20. Glaz’ev S.Iu. Teoriia dolgosrochnogo tekhniko-ekonomicheskogo razvitiia [The Theory of Long-Term Technical and Economic Development], Moscow, VlaDar, 1993, 310 p. (In Russ.).

21. Bell D. Griadushchee postindustrial’noe obshchestvo [The Coming PostIndustrial Society], translated from English. Moscow, Academia, 2004, 944 p. (In Russ.).

22. Khudiakova E.G. Otsenka chelovecheskogo kapitala i effektivnosti ego ispol’zovaniia v interesakh innovatsionnogo razvitiia predpriiatiia. Diss. kand. ekon. nauk. [Assessment of Human Capital and the Effectiveness of Its Use in the Interests of Innovative Development of the Enterprise. PhD econ. Sci. diss.], Ufa, 2019, 169 p. (In Russ.).

23. Valentei S.D. Federalizm i innovatsionnaia modernizatsiia [Federalism and Innovative Modernization], Federalizm [Federalism], 2013, No. 1 (69), pp. 7–10. (In Russ.).

24. Baicker K., Clements J. The Rise of the States: US Fiscal decentralization in the Postwar period, Harvard University Press, 2011, April, pp. 11–34.

25. Regional’naia politika: zarubezhnyi opyt i rossiiskie realii [Regional Policy: Foreign Experience and Russian Realities], edited by A.V. Kuznetsova, O.V. Kuznetsovoi. Moscow, IMEMO RAN, 2015, 137 p. (In Russ.).

26. Otraslevye instrumenty innovatsionnoi politiki [Industry Instruments of Innovation Policy], edited by N.I. Ivanovoi, Moscow, IMEMO RAN, 2016, 161 p. (In Russ.).

27. Leonov S.N., Sidorenko O.V. Selektivnaia regional’naia politika kak samostoiatel’nyi tip regional’noi politiki gosudarstva [Selective Regional Policy as an Independent Type of Regional Policy of the State], Gosudarstvennoe upravlenie [Public administration], 2011, Iss. 28, pp. 11–16. (In Russ.).

28. Balashova M.A. Intellektual’nyi kapital: sushchnost’, sposoby izmereniia, kritika [Intellectual Capital: Essence, Methods of Measurement, Criticism], Izvestiia Irkutskoi gosudarstvennoi ekonomicheskoi akademii [News of the Irkutsk State Economic Academy], 2014, No. 1, pp. 22–29. (In Russ.).

29. Sharokhina S.V., Shevchenko T.A., Kokorina O.K. Kontseptsiia chelovecheskogo kapitala v strategii upravleniia chelovecheskimi resursami [The Concept of Human Capital in the Strategy of Human Resource Management], Innovatsii i investitsii [Innovations and Investments], 2021, No. 2, pp. 72–76. (In Russ.).

30. National Science Foundation. Science and Engineering Indictors. Available at: https://ncses.nsf.gov/indicators/data#data-sources-tab

31. Historical Statistics of the United States. Available at: http://istmat.info/files/uploads/historical_statistics_of_the_united_states

32. Statistical Abstract of the United States, Wash., U.S. Government Printing Office. Available at: https://books.google.ru/books?id=YkXjuVR9iN8C&hl=ru

33. Research and Development: U.S. Trends and International Comparisons. Available at: https://www.statistics/report/sections/research-and-development-u-strends-and-international-comparisons/

34. Human Development Indices and Indicators. Statistical Update Briefing Note for Countries on the 2020. Statistical Update, United States. Available at: http://hdr.undp.org/sites/default/files/Country-Profiles/USA.pdf

35. American Science in Numbers and Commentary: Statistical Indicators, National and Regional Studies, Forecasts, Wash, 2021. Available at: https://unctad. org/en/PublicationsLibrary/

36. Smirnova R.N. Vlozheniia v chelovecheskii kapital kak resurs regional’nogo razvitiia v postindustrial’nuiu epokhu (na primere SShA) [Investments in Human Capital as a Resource for Regional Development in the Post-Industrial Era (On the Example of the United States)], Regional’nye issledovaniia [Regional Studies], 2013, No. 2 (40), pp. 107–114. (In Russ.).

37. Minat V.N. Gosudarstvennaia regional’naia politika i razvitie regional’nykh innovatsionnykh sistem v SShA [State Regional Policy and the Development of Regional Innovation Systems in the United States], Federalizm [Federalism], 2020, Vol. 25, No. 4 (100), pp. 173–188. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.21686/2073-1051-2020-4-173-188

38. Gligich-Zolotareva M.V. Na poroge novoi regionalizatsii [On the Threshold of New Regionalization], Federalizm [Federalism], 2021, Vol. 26, No. 1 (101), pp. 163–186. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.21686/2073-1051-2021-1-165-186

39. Gligich-Zolotareva M.V., Luk’ianova N.I. Effektivnost’ federativnogo gosudarstva v usloviiakh pandemii koronavirusa [The Effectiveness of the Federal State in the Context of the Coronavirus Pandemic], Federalizm [Federalism], 2020, Vol. 25, No. 3 (99), pp. 145–168. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.21686/2073-1051-2020-3-145-168

40. Stroeva O.A., Kvak A.A. Instrumentarii realizatsii regional’noi innovatsionnoi politiki proaktivnogo kharaktera [Toolkit for the Implementation of a Proactive Regional Innovation Policy], Srednerusskii vestnik obshchestvennykh nauk [Srednerusskiy Vestnik of Social Sciences], 2014, No. 6 (36), pp. 102–109. (In Russ.).