Preview

Federalism

Advanced search

Urbooriented Development of the National Innovative System in the US Metro Areas

https://doi.org/10.21686/2073-1051-2021-1-187-206

Abstract

The socio-economic heterogeneity of spatial development is reflected in modern agglomeration processes, reflecting, first of all, the concentration and localization of innovative activity of elements of innovation systems of the national, regional and transregional levels associated with the reproduction process of the innovation economy. In the United States of America, a  country  that  occupies  a  leading  position,  both  in  terms  of  innovative  development  and the  process  of  urbanization,  there  is  undoubtedly  a  close  relationship  and  interaction  of innovatively active elements and economic agents with the structures that form the country’s metropolitan areas. Within the framework of this interaction, carried out under the influence of agglomeration effects in the space of post-industrial agglomerations of the United States, the urban-oriented development of the national innovation system is actively carried out, which  is  empirically  confirmed  in  the  framework  of  the  study.  The  revealed  correlation and indicative relationship between the noted phenomena made it possible to substantiate a number of specific features of the American metropolitan areas as geospatial conglomerates of innovative activity at the transregional level.

About the Author

V. N. Minat
Federal  State  Budgetary  Educational  Institution  Higher  Education  Ryazan State Agrotechnological Institute University Named After P.A. Kostychev
Russian Federation

MINAT Valery N. - Cand.  Sc.  (Geography),  Associate  Professor,  Associate  Professor  of  the  Department of Economics and Management

1, Kostycheva Str., Ryazan, 390044



References

1. Kolosov V.A., Vendina O.I., Ekkert D. Regional’nye tsentry v usloviiakh globalizatsii: problemy sravnitel’nykh issledovanii [Regional Centers in the Context of Globalization: Problems of Comparative Research], Krupneishie goroda i vyzovy globalizatsii[Big Cities and Challenges of Globalization], edited by V.A. Kolosov, D. Ekkert. Smolensk, Oikumena, 2003, pp. 9–26. (In Russ.).

2. Lappo G.M. Goroda Rossii [Cities of Russia].Vzgliad geografa [Geographer’s View]. Moscow, Novyi khronograf, 2012, 504 p. (In Russ.).

3. Loseva A.V., Pudova M.V., Samus’ D.A. Rol’ megapolisov v dostizhenii tselei ustoichivogo razvitiia [The Role of Megacities in Achieving Sustainable Development Goals], Vestnik NGUEU[Vestnik NSUEM], 2019, No. 4, pp. 233–243. (In Russ.). Available at: DOI: 10.34020/2073-6495-2019-4-233-243

4. Shvetsov A.N. Gorodskaia aglomeratsiia – organizatsionnaia forma preobrazovaniia prostranstva v Rossiiskoi Federatsii [Urban Agglomeration – the Organizational Form of Space Transformation in the Russian Federation], Federalizm [Federalizm], 2017, No. 2(86), pp. 47–60. (In Russ.).

5. Antonov E.V., Makhrova A.G. Krupneishie gorodskie aglomeratsii i formy rasseleniia nadaglomeratsionnogo urovnia v Rossii [Largest Urban Agglomerations and Super-Agglomerations in Russia], Izvestiia RAN. Seriya geograficheskaia [Izvestiya RAN (Akad. Nauk SSSR). Geographical Series], 2019, No. 4, pp. 31–45. (In Russ.). Available at: DOI: 10.31857/S2587-55662019431-45

6. Krom E. Chto takoe globalizatsiia 2:0. [What is 2: 0 Globalization]. (In Russ.). Available at: https://tv.rbc.ru/archive/news/5fd0b44d2ae5962c9cd58e26 (accessed 09 December 2020).

7. Khanna P. Konnektografiia. Budushchee global’noi tsivilizatsii [The Future of global civilization]. Moscow, Mann, Ivanov i Ferber, 2019, 432 p. (In Russ.).

8. Kheifets B.A. Metamorfoza ekonomicheskoi globalizatsii [Metamorphosis of Economic Globalization]. Moscow, Institution of Science Institute of Economics of the RAS, 2018, 41 p. (In Russ.).

9. Knapp W., Schmitt P. Re-Structuring Competitive Metropolitan Regions in North-West Europe: On Territory and Governance. Europ. J. Spatial Development, 20 03, No. 6. Available at: http://www.nordregio.se/Global/EJSD/Refereed%20articles/refereed

10. Kharitonov V.M. Funktsional’naia tipologiia gorodskikh aglomeratsii SShA [A Functional Typology of U.S. Metropolitan Areas], Voprosy ekonomicheskoi i politicheskoi geografii zarubezhnykh stran[Ques t ions of Economic and Polit ical Geogr aphy of Foreign Countries], 1980, No. 3, pp. 300–317. (In Russ.).

11. CIA. The World Factbook. USA. People and Society. Available at: https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/us.html

12. Shanin A.A. Faktory ekonomicheskogo rosta gorodskikh aglomeratsii SShA v poslednie desiatiletiia XX veka. Avtoref. diss. kand. geogr. nauk [Factors of Economic Growth of Urban Agglomerations in the United States in the Last Decades of the Twentieth Century. PhD geograph. sci. abstract diss.], Moscow, 2006, 28 p. (In Russ.).

13. Kudrin A. Goroda vmesto nefti [Cities Instead of Oil]. (In Russ.). Available at: https://www.vedomosti.ru/opinion/articles/2017/07/20/724744-goroda-nefti (accessed 20 July 2017).

14. Kuznetsov D.V. Sovremennye osobennosti metropolitenizatsii v SShA. Avtoref. diss. kand. geogr. nauk. [Modern Features of the Subway in the USA. PhD geograph. sci. abstract diss.], Saint Petersburg, 2010, 16 p. (In Russ.).

15. Petrovskii A.B., Pronichkin S.V, Sternin M.Iu., Shepelev G.I. Natsional’naia innovatsionnaia sistema SShA: kharakteristiki, osobennosti, puti razvitiia [National Innovation System of the USA: Characteristics, Features, Development Paths], Nauchnye vedomosti. Seriya: Ekonomika. Informatika [Scientific Statements. series: Economics. Computer Science], 2018, No. 2, Vol. 45, pp. 343–352. (In Russ.). Available at: DOI: 10.18413/2411-3808-2018-45-2-343-352.

16. Shapira P., Youtie J. The Innovation System and Innovation Polisy in the United States. Competing for Global Innovation Leadership. Innovation Systems and Policies in the USA, EU and Asia, Rainer Frietsch and Margot Schüller (Eds.), Fraunhofer IRB Verlag, Stuttgart, Chapter, 2010.

17. Simons K.L. The US National Innovation System. Encyclopedia of Tech nolog y and Innovation, 2008.

18. Minat V.N. Gosudarstvennaia regional’naia politika i razvitie regional’nykh innovatsionnykh sistem v SShA [Public Regional Policy and the Development of Regional Innovation Systems in the USA], Federalizm [Federalizm], 2020, Vol. 25, No. 4, pp. 173–188. (In Russ.). Available at: DOI: 10.21686/2073-1051-2020-4-173-188

19. Minat V.N. Tipy territorial’nykh form natsional’noi innovatsionnoi sistemy SShA i ikh kontsentratsiia v gorodskikh aglomeratsiiakh [Types of US Territorial National Innovation Systems and Theirs in Urban Agglomerations], Innovatsii[ Innovation], 2020, No. 5 (259), pp. 68–80. (In Russ.). Available at: DOI: 10.26310/2071-3010.2020.259.5.010

20. Polovitskaia M.E. Geografiia nauchnykh issledovanii v SShA [Geography of Scientific Research in the USA]. Moscow, Mysl’, 1977, 234 p. (In Russ.).

21. Vendina O.I. Mozhno li uvidet’ chetkie perspektivy v tumannom budushchem gorodov? [Can You See Clear Prospects in the Hazy Future of Cities?]. Neprikosnovennyi zapas [Emergency Reserve], 2010, No. 2. (In Russ.). Available at: https://magazines.gorky.media/nz/2010/2/mozhno-li-uvidet-chetkie-perspektivy-v-tumannom-budushhemgorodov.html

22. Temirgaleev R.F. Sovremennye tendentsii v ramkakh gorodskikh aglomeratsii SShA [Modern Trends in the Urban Agglomeration of the United States], Regional’nye issledovaniia [Regional Studies], 2014, No. 3, pp. 100–107. (In Russ.).

23. Sluka N.S. Gradotsentricheskaia model’ mirovogo khoziaistva [The City-Centric Model of World Domination]. Moscow, Press-Solo, 2005, 168 p. (In Russ.).

24. Levintov A.V. Shtandort Las-Vegasa [Standard of Las Vegas], A . Les h kak filos of ekonomicheskogo prostranstva (k stoletiiu so dnia rozhdeniia)[A. Lesch as a Philosopher of Economic Space (on the Centenary of His Birth)]. Moscow, 2007, pp. 247–275. (In Russ.).

25. Druzhinin A.G. Metropolii i metropolizatsiia v sovremennoi Rossii: kontseptual’nye podkhody v politiko-geograficheskom kontekste [Metropolises and Metropolisation in Modern Russia: Conceptual Approaches in the Political and Geographical Context], Izvestiia RAN. Seriya geograficheskaia [Izvestiya RAN (Akad. Nauk SSSR). Geographical Series], 2014, No.1, pp. 19–27. (In Russ.).

26. Valentei S.D. Ekonomika innovatsii i problemy ee formirovaniia [Economy of Innovation and Problems of its Formation], Nauka i praktika REU im. G.V. Plekhanova [Science and Practice of Plekhanov Russian University of Economics], 2012, No. 1 (7), pp. 51–58. (In Russ.).

27. Nikitskaia E.F. Rol’ aglomeratsii v razvitii regional’nogo segmenta natsional’noi innovatsionnoi sistemy Rossii [The Role of Agglomerations in the Development of the Regional Segment of the National Innovation System of Russia], Federalizm[Federalizm], 2018, No. 2, pp. 46–63. (In Russ.).

28. Freeman C. Methods of Research of Urbanized Territories of American Agglomerations. Systematization of Scientific Approaches. Wash. Bureau of national statistics and forecasts, 1975, 580 p.

29. Baldwin S.P. American Agglomerations: Economic and Social Statistics of Territories. Wash. United States Congress publishing house, 2010, 526 p.

30. Zhuk N.P. Vzaimodeistvie kak faktor innovatsionnogo razvitiia: aglomeratsionnye effekty [Interaction as a Factor of Innovative Development: Agglomeration Effects], Innovatsii[Innovations], 2014, No. 1, pp. 32–36. (In Russ.).

31. Minat V.N., Chepik A.G. Vneshnetorgovye otnosheniia i innovatsionnaia deiatel’nost’ SShA [Foreign Trade Relations and Innovation in the United States], Mezhdunarodnaia torgovlia i torgovaia politika[International Trade and Trade Policy], 2020, Vol. 6, No. 2 (22), pp. 5–21. (In Russ.). Available at: DOI: 10.21686/2410-7395-2020-2-5-21

32. Миnat V.N. Dinamika struktury vneshnei torgovli SShA vysokotekhnologichnoi produktsiei obrabatyvaiushchei promyshlennosti [Dynamics of the Structure of US Foreign Trade in High-Tech Manufacturing Products], Mezhdunarodnaia torgovlia i torgovaia politika [International Trade and Trade Policy], 2020, Vol. 6, No. 4 (24), pp. 44–62. (In Russ.). Available at: DOI: 10.21686/2410-7395-2020-4-44-62

33. Historical Trends in Federal R&D, American Association for the Advancement of Science,2020. Available at: https://www.aaas.org/programs/r-d-budget-and-policy/historical-rd-data

34. U. S. Census Bureau. Available at: https://www.commerce.gov/bureaus-andoffices/census

35. Statistical Abstract of the United States, Wash.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 2020. Available at: https://books.google.ru/books?id=YkXjuVR9iN8C&hl=ru


Review

For citations:


Minat V.N. Urbooriented Development of the National Innovative System in the US Metro Areas. Federalism. 2021;(1):187-206. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21686/2073-1051-2021-1-187-206

Views: 584


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2073-1051 (Print)