Preview

Federalism

Advanced search

On the Threshold of a New Regionalization

https://doi.org/10.21686/2073-1051-2021-1-165-186

Abstract

American and European federalism served as a real model in the construction of the domestic state system for a long time. It is difficult to deny that these were indeed the best known examples  of  the  organization  of  the  administration  of  geographically  complex  states.  But the  coronavirus  pandemic  has  escalated  old  socio-political  and  economic  contradictions. The regionalization become one of the trends in the development of the state in the era of coronavirus. It means that role of regions and municipalities become disproportionately sharp. As a result decentralization and even separatism have grown. Similar problems can lead to the undermining not only of the economy, but also of territorial and even political integrity in most countries. The situation of tension between the center and the regions concerned not only sufficiently well-established Federal state such as the US, but the so-called “regional states” – Great Britain, Italy, Spain, and even interstate associations represented by the European  Union.  Obviously,  the  well-studied  models  of  federalism  of  Western  countries can no longer be a reference point for Russia and other countries. We need own models of state-territorial structure.

About the Author

M. V. Gligich-Zolotareva
Federal State Budget Educational Institution of Higher Education Plekhanov Russian University of Economics
Russian Federation

GLIGICH-ZOLOTAREVA Milena V. - Cand. Sc. (Law), Leading Researcher of the Scientific Laboratory «Analysis of Law Enforcement Practice in the Economy of the Russian Federation»

36, Stremyanny lane, Moscow, 117997



References

1. Fukuiama F. Konets istorii i poslednii chelovek [End of Story and Last Person], translated from English by M.B. Levina. Moscow, AST, 2004. (In Russ.).

2. Kniazeva E.N., Kurdiumov S.P. Printsipy koevoliutsii slozhnykh sistem i sotsial’noe upravlenie [Principles of Coevolution of Complex Systems and Social Management], Sinergetika i sotsial’noe upravlenie[Synergetics and Social Management]. Moscow, RAGS, 1998, pp. 8–18. (In Russ.).

3. Federalizm: Entsiklopedicheskii slovar’ [Federalism: Encyclopedic Dictionary], edited by S.D. Valentei. Moscow, INFRA-M, 1997. (In Russ.).

4. Ermolova I.E. Rimskaia imperiia i federaty v IV v. [Roman Empire and Federates in the 4th Century], Novyi istoricheskii vestnik[ New Historical Bullet in], 2001, No. 2 (4). (In Russ.). Available at: http://ancientrome.ru/publik/article.htm?a=1361795291

5. Egorov A.B. Rimskoe gosudarstvo i pravo. Epokha imperii: Uchebnoe posobie [ Roman State and Law. Age of Empire: Study Guide]. Saint Petersburg, 2013. ( In Russ .).

6. Stringgol’m A. Pokhody vikingov [Viking Campaigns], translated from German by A. Shemiakina. Moscow, AST, 2007. (In Russ.).

7. Nazar’ev V. Rossiia na rasput’e. Tsarevich-izbavitel’ protiv vybrannykh liudei [Russia is at a Crossroads. The Prince-Redeemer Against the Chosen People], Rodina [Homeland], 2005, No. 11. pp. 6–10. (In Russ.).

8. Prigozhin I., Stengers I. Poriadok iz khaosa: Novyi dialog cheloveka s prirodoi [Or der Out of Chaos: A New Dialogue Bet ween Man and Nature], translate from Englis h, edited by V.I. Arshinova, Iu.L. Klimontovicha, Iu.V. Sachkova. Moscow, Progress, 1986, pp. 248–258. (In Russ.).

9. Iashchenko A.S. Teoriia federalizma. Opyt sinteticheskoi teorii prava i gosudarstva [The Theory of Federalism. The Experience of the Synthetic Theory of Law and State]. Iur’ev, 1912. (In Russ.).

10. Krizhanich Iu. Politika [Politics]. Moscow, 1997. (In Russ.).


Review

For citations:


Gligich-Zolotareva M.V. On the Threshold of a New Regionalization. Federalism. 2021;(1):165-186. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21686/2073-1051-2021-1-165-186

Views: 615


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2073-1051 (Print)