Public-Private Partnership: Prospects for the Development of Socially Significant Infrastructure
https://doi.org/10.21686/10.21686/2073-1051-2019-4-75-94
Abstract
Public-private partnership (PPP) has turned to become a constantly replicated stamp, which is widely used both in Russia and abroad. PPP is associated with the forms of organization of economic cooperation between the state and the private business, which bring benefits to both partners: the state develops public infrastructure (public good), saving budgetary funds and focusing on the experience of private investors; private investors use a stable risk-free” sphere of their investments with a stable long-term rate of return under the patronage of the state. However, in Russia as well as in other countries of the world, PPP projects are expanding slowly, especially in socially significant infrastructure as a powerful driver of future economic growth. In this regard, the problem of creating the conditions necessary to ensure the multiplier effect of budget financing of public infrastructure in conditions of a deficit of public finances is becoming especially urgent. It is advisable for the state to use budget financing not to invest in PPP projects, but to ensure the interests of private investors, including institutional players.
About the Author
Ya. I. Vaslavskiy
Moscow State Institute of International Relations (MGIMO University)
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Vaslavskiy Yan I. - Ph.D. in Political Science, Associate Professor, Department of Political Theory.
76, Vernadskogo prospekt, Moscow, 119454.
References
1. IMF. World Economic Outlook. July 23, 2019. URL: https://www.ranepa.ru/eng
2. World Bank. Restoration of the Russian Economy: How Stable are the Growth signs? // WB. Report on the Russian Economy. 2017. N 38. November. URL: https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/bitstream/handle/10986/28930/30-11-2017-17-58-52-for-webNovFINALRERENGMl.pdf?sequence=7&isAllowed=y
3. Инвестиции в инфраструктуру 2018. Аналитический обзор: Итоги 2017 г. Прогноз на 2018—2019 гг. М.: InfraONE, 2018. URL: https://infraone.ru/analitika/infraone_sochi_2018.pdf
4. Global Lessons on Financing Infrastructure. Infrastructure Round Table. Lagos. 2013. August 5. URL: http://www.sec.gov.ng/files/SEC.%20COMM%20DAY%201/Infrastructure%20roundtable_McKinsey%20presentation.pdf
5. Варнавский В.Г. Государственно-частное партнерство как антикризисная мера // Институты и механизмы государственного регулирования экономики: сборник / под. ред. А.Е. Городецкого, А.Г. Зельднера, С.В. Козловой. М.: ИЭ РАН, 2012. C. 23-35.
6. Зедина Ю.А. Партнерство государства и бизнеса в сфере производства и реализации общественных благ // Федерализм. 2014. № 4. С. 90-93.
7. Просто и честно об инвестициях в инфраструктуру. Аналитический обзор: Рейтинг регионов по уровню развития ГЧП 2018-2019 гг. М.: РОСИНФРА, 2019. URL: http://pppcenter.ru/assets/files/obzor240419.pdf
8. Мереминская Е. ГЧП не пришло на смену государству // Ведомости. 2017. 01 июня. URL: https://www.vedomosti.ru/economics/articles/2017/06/01/692466-gchp
9. Адамчук О., Папченкова М. Правительство придумало способ построить инфраструктуру в рассрочку // Ведомости. 2017. 28 ноября. URL: https://www.vedomosti.ru/economics/articles/2017/11/28/743286-infrastrukturu-rassrochku
10. Блауг М. Экономическая мысль в ретроспективе. М.: Дело ЛТД, 1994. 720 с.
11. Commons J. Industrial Economics // American Economic Review. 1931. Vol. 21. № 4. P. 648-657.
12. Coase R.H. The Nature of the Firm // Economica. 1937. V 4. N 5. P. 386-405.
13. Chueng S.N.S. The Myth of Social Costs. 1978. L.: Institute of Economic Affairs. 96 р.
14. Норт Д. Институты, институциональные изменения и функционирование экономики. М.: Фонд экономической книги «Начала», 1997. 180 c.
15. Posner R.A. Economic Analysis of Law. NY: A Division of Aspen Publishers. Inc., A Wolters Kluwer Company. 1998. 802 p.
16. Demsetz H. Toward a Theory of Property Rights // American Economic Review. 1967. V 57. N 2. P. 347-359.
17. Pejovich S. Fundamentals of Economics: A Property Rights Approach. Dallas: The Fisher Institute, 1981.
18. Toumanoff P.G. Theory of Market Failure // Kyklos. 1984. V 37. N 4. P. 529-541.
19. Tanzi V. Government Versus Markets: the Changing Economic Role of the State. Cambridge: Sindkate of the Press of the University of Cambridge, 2011. 392 p.
20. IMF Fiscal Monitor. Capitalizing on Good Times. Washington: IMF, 2018. April. 142 p.
21. Garcia-Escribano M., Liu C.Y. Expenditure Assessment Tool (EAT). Fiscal Affairs Department Technical Notes and Manuals 17/06. International Monetary Fund. Washington, DC, 2017. URL: https://www.imf.org/~/media/Files/Publications/TNM/2017/tnm1706.ashx
22. Still Sluggish Global Growth // IMF. World Economic Outlook. July 23, 2019. URL: https://www.elibrary.imf.org › view › binaries › English_July _2019_Update
23. ЦМАК. Тезисы об экономике. 2018 г. Итоги. Выпуск 7. 09.04.2019. URL: http://www.forecast.ru
24. Прогноз социально-экономического развития РФ на период 2019 — 2021 гг. МЭР РФ. URL: https://www.bigpowernews.ru
25. Vaslavskiy Y, Vaslavskaya I. Infrastructure Public-Private Partnership Projects: Budget Consolidation Policy in Russia and Government Expenditures Efficiency Increase // Modeling Economic Growth in Contemporary Russia, edited by Bruno S. Sergi. Bingley: Emerald Publishing, 2019. P. 203-232.
26. Ваславский Я.И., Ваславская И.Ю. Государственно-частное партнерство: институциональный подход. М.: АСПЕКТ ПРЕСС, 2019. 412 с.
27. The World Bank Group. Private Participation in Infrastructure Projects Database // The Public-Private Infrastructure Advisory Facility. 2008. July. URL: https://ppi.worldbank.org
28. Радыгин А.Д., Симачев Ю.В., Энтов Р.М. Государственная компания: сфера проявления «провалов государства» или «провалов рынка»? // Вопросы экономики. 2015. № 1. С. 45—79.
Review
For citations:
Vaslavskiy Ya.I. Public-Private Partnership: Prospects for the Development of Socially Significant Infrastructure. Federalism. 2019;(4):75-94. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21686/10.21686/2073-1051-2019-4-75-94
Views:
776
Email this article 