REGIONAL SPECIFICITY OF INTEGRATION OF INTERNAL ETHNIC MIGRANTS
Abstract
The inflow of internal migrants, representatives of «visible minorities», into the Russian regions leads to tensions between local population and those migrants, especially from the North Caucasus. Domestic migrants are Russian citizens, but often they are poorly integrated into local communities. The author analyzes the factors and the level of integration of internal migrants in various regions of Russia. The paper shows that the level of integration of migrants depends on the state of interethnic relations as they are perceived by local population and migrants. The dependence has been revealed of the migrants’ integration on the consolidation of the local community and its benevolence. Special attention is paid to the analysis of the integration of local residents in local communities. It’s shown that the levels of integration of migrants and non-migrants into the local community are closely interrelated. Where local communities are better integrated, the integration of migrants is more successful: a favourable social context creates incentives for the integration of migrants. Particular attention is paid to the structures of identities of local residents and migrants. Migrants adopt the standards of social behaviour of representatives of local communities. The structures of the migrant’s identities are gradually transformed, converging with the structures of the identities of local residents. Integrated migrants are oriented at the best social inclusion patterns of the local population, and non-integrated migrants are guided by the worst asocial behaviour patterns.
About the Author
V. I. MukomelRussian Federation
MUKOMEL Vladimir I., Dr. Sc. (Soc.), Chief researcher, Head of the Department for Migration and Integration Studies
24/35, build.5, Krzizanovskogo St., Moscow, 117218
References
1. Общественное мнение. 2017. М.: Левада-Центр, 2018. 244 с.
2. Россия реформирующаяся: ежегодник [сборник научных статей] / отв. ред. М.К. Горшков; Институт социологии РАН. М.: Новый хронограф, 2016. Вып. 14. 496 с.
3. Межнациональное согласие в региональном контексте: сб. науч. ст. / рук. проекта и отв. редактор Л.М. Дробижева. М.: Институт социологии РАН, 2015. 125 с.
4. Мукомель В.И. Проблемы интеграции внутрироссийских иноэтничных мигрантов // Социологические исследования. 2016. № 5. С. 69—79.
5. Ресурс межэтнического согласия в Москве [Электронный ресурс] / рук. проекта и отв. редактор Л.М. Дробижева. М.: Институт социологии РАН, 2014. URL: http://www.isras.ru/inab_2014_02.html
6. Рыбаковский Л.Л. Стадии миграционного процесса // Миграция населения / под общ. ред. О.Д. Воробьевой. Вып. 5. М., 2001.
7. Ксенофобия и национализм [Пипия Карина] / Левада-Центр. 25.08.2015. URL: http://www.levada.ru/25-08-2015/ksenofobiya-i-natsionalizm
8. Huddleston Th., Niessen J., Tjaden J.D. Using EU Indicators of Immigrant Integration // Final Report for Directorate-General for Home Affairs. Brussels: European Commission, 2013. Р. 73.
9. Indicators of Immigrant Integration 2015: Settling In. OECD Publishing, 2015. DOI: 10.1787/9789264234024-en
10. Мукомель В. Cвои «иные»: внутрироссийские иноэтничные мигранты в московском мегаполисе // Федерализм. 2015. № 1. С. 79—92.
11. Парсонс Т. О социальных системах / под ред. В.Ф. Чесноковой и С.А. Белановского. М.: Академический проект, 2002.
Review
For citations:
Mukomel V.I. REGIONAL SPECIFICITY OF INTEGRATION OF INTERNAL ETHNIC MIGRANTS. Federalism. 2018;(2):141-160. (In Russ.)