<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">federalizm</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Федерализм</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Federalism</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">2073-1051</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Plekhanov Russian University of Economics</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.21686/2073-1051-2016-1-107-120</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">federalizm-702</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>БЮДЖЕТНЫЙ ФЕДЕРАЛИЗМ</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>FISCAL FEDERALISM</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Налоговая политика и возможности экономического роста: региональный аспект</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Tax policy and economic growth possibilities: regional aspect</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Лыкова</surname><given-names>Людмила Никитична</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Lykova</surname><given-names>Lyudmila N.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email xlink:type="simple">lykoval@inecon.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>Институт экономики РАН</institution><country>Россия</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>Institute of Economics, RAS</institution><country>Russian Federation</country></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2016</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>20</day><month>07</month><year>2023</year></pub-date><volume>0</volume><issue>1</issue><fpage>107</fpage><lpage>120</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Лыкова Л.Н., 2023</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2023</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Лыкова Л.Н.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Lykova L.N.</copyright-holder><license xml:lang="ru" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.</license-p></license><license xml:lang="en" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://federalizm.rea.ru/jour/article/view/702">https://federalizm.rea.ru/jour/article/view/702</self-uri><abstract><p>Налоговая политика Российской Федерации в части подоходного налогообложения начиная с кризисного 2009 г. была нацелена на снижение налоговой нагрузки на доходы от капитала для поддержания экономической активности хозяйствующих субъектов. Снижение налоговой нагрузки имело место и по федеральной, и по региональной составляющей. Порядок уплаты налога консолидированными группами налогоплательщиков приводит к перераспределению поступлений налога на прибыль между бюджетами субъектов РФ и устанавливает более выраженную их зависимость от конъюнктуры мировых рынков. Структура льгот по налогу на прибыль существенно различается для различных типов субъектов Федерации. Только в пяти регионах доминирует региональная составляющая налоговой политики. Для всех остальных субъектов РФ федеральные налоговые льготы формируют основной объем потерь региональных бюджетов. Отмена региональных налоговых льгот не позволит решить проблемы с формированием доходов бюджетов субъектов РФ, необходимы поиски иных источников.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>Tax policy of the Russian Federation in the sphere of income taxation since the crisis year of 2009 was aimed at the reduction the tax burden on capital income in order to maintain the activity of economic entities. The tax burden reduction took place both in federal and regional component. The procedure of the tax payment by consolidated groups of taxpayers leads to the redistribution of tax revenues between the budgets of the subjects of federation and sets their more pronounced dependence on world markets. The structure of the tax benefits within profit tax varies considerably for the different types of subjects of Federation. Only in five regions the regional component of tax policy dominates. For all other subjects of the Russian Federation federal tax benefits form the main volume of losses for regional budgets. The abolition of regional tax benefits will not solve the problem with forming budgets revenue of subjects of the Russian Federation, it is necessary to find other sources.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>амортизационная премия</kwd><kwd>консолидированные группы налогоплательщиков</kwd><kwd>налог на прибыль организаций</kwd><kwd>налоговая политика</kwd><kwd>налоговые льготы</kwd><kwd>региональные бюджеты</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">См., напр.: B ir d R .M . Fi nanci n g Canadia n Gover n ment : A Quantitative O ver v iew. Toronto. Canadian Tax Foundations, 1979</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">См., напр.: B ir d R .M . Fi nanci n g Canadia n Gover n ment : A Quantitative O ver v iew. Toronto. Canadian Tax Foundations, 1979</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Boadway R.W., Kitchen H.M. Canadian Tax Policy. 3rd ed. Toronto. Canadian Tax Foundations, 1999</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Boadway R.W., Kitchen H.M. Canadian Tax Policy. 3rd ed. Toronto. Canadian Tax Foundations, 1999</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Лыкова Л.Н., Букина И.С. Налоговые системы зарубежных стран. М.: Юрайт, 2013. С. 428</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Лыкова Л.Н., Букина И.С. Налоговые системы зарубежных стран. М.: Юрайт, 2013. С. 428</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">См.: Eurostat (2014). Taxat iontr end sin the Europe an Union. 2 014 ed ition. Eurost at 2014</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">См.: Eurostat (2014). Taxat iontr end sin the Europe an Union. 2 014 ed ition. Eurost at 2014</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Lykova L.N. Tax burden in Russian Federation: comparative analyses point of view // Journal of Tax Reform. 2015. N 1. Р. 76-89</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Lykova L.N. Tax burden in Russian Federation: comparative analyses point of view // Journal of Tax Reform. 2015. N 1. Р. 76-89</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">URL: www.nalog.ru</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">URL: www.nalog.ru</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">URL: www.gks.ru и Федерального казначейства</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">URL: www.gks.ru и Федерального казначейства</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">См.: Eu r o stat (2 014). Ta xat ion t r end s i n the Eu rope a n Un ion. 2 014 ed ition . Euro s t a t 2 014</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">См.: Eu r o stat (2 014). Ta xat ion t r end s i n the Eu rope a n Un ion. 2 014 ed ition . Euro s t a t 2 014</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit9"><label>9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Lykova L.N. Tax burden in Russian Federation: comparative analyses point of view // Journal of Tax Reform. 2015. N 1. Р. 76-89</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Lykova L.N. Tax burden in Russian Federation: comparative analyses point of view // Journal of Tax Reform. 2015. N 1. Р. 76-89</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit10"><label>10</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">URL: www.roskazna.ru</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">URL: www.roskazna.ru</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit11"><label>11</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">URL: www.nalog.ru</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">URL: www.nalog.ru</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
